<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re-naming the Semantic Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rachellovinger.com/2007/05/29/re-naming-the-semantic-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rachellovinger.com/2007/05/29/re-naming-the-semantic-web/</link>
	<description>Pursuing datameaningfulness, online and off</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.rachellovinger.com/2007/05/29/re-naming-the-semantic-web/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meaningfuldata.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/re-naming-the-semantic-web/#comment-933</guid>
		<description>I always thought that Web 3.0 was too derivative. Presently, it seems like the contest is between the names &quot;semantic web&quot; and &quot;data web&quot; which is favored by Nova of Radar Networks.

With the possible acquisition of Powerset by MS. The &quot;web yet to be named&quot; seems a little closer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought that Web 3.0 was too derivative. Presently, it seems like the contest is between the names &#8220;semantic web&#8221; and &#8220;data web&#8221; which is favored by Nova of Radar Networks.</p>
<p>With the possible acquisition of Powerset by MS. The &#8220;web yet to be named&#8221; seems a little closer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://blog.rachellovinger.com/2007/05/29/re-naming-the-semantic-web/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meaningfuldata.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/re-naming-the-semantic-web/#comment-922</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny, it&#039;s been a year since I wrote this post, and the name &quot;Web 3.0&quot; hasn&#039;t gained any more traction. I&#039;m thinking we may be stuck with the name &quot;semantic web.&quot; Not so bad, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny, it&#8217;s been a year since I wrote this post, and the name &#8220;Web 3.0&#8243; hasn&#8217;t gained any more traction. I&#8217;m thinking we may be stuck with the name &#8220;semantic web.&#8221; Not so bad, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.rachellovinger.com/2007/05/29/re-naming-the-semantic-web/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meaningfuldata.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/re-naming-the-semantic-web/#comment-921</guid>
		<description>Agreed, the dialog has dramatically shifted from talking about the wonder of how all the plumbing works to the simple fact that operation moves water better than bringing water into the house with a bucket and throwing it out a window when you are done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, the dialog has dramatically shifted from talking about the wonder of how all the plumbing works to the simple fact that operation moves water better than bringing water into the house with a bucket and throwing it out a window when you are done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
