<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Word of the Day: Metaphrast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rachellovinger.com/2008/08/01/new-word-of-the-day-metaphrast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rachellovinger.com/2008/08/01/new-word-of-the-day-metaphrast/</link>
	<description>Pursuing datameaningfulness, online and off</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:40:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://blog.rachellovinger.com/2008/08/01/new-word-of-the-day-metaphrast/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruth Kaufman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meaningfuldata.wordpress.com/?p=96#comment-938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This concept seems related to the idea that the content of every new medium is the old medium. The early content of television was radio. The early content of the internet was publications. I think what&#039;s changing is that the phenomenon is not movement in a singular direction of &quot;progress&quot;. Perhaps we&#039;re at the point where all media are fare game as content for all other media. 

Sanford Dickert (@sanford) tweeted this from a Video 2.0 meetup:
&quot;Television is a technology, a lazy term - come up with a better one.&quot; Ned from NYTVF
http://twitter.com/sanford/statuses/871063978

A short conversation ensued (I&#039;m @mapkid):
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=television+mapkid

Anyway, fascinating concept.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This concept seems related to the idea that the content of every new medium is the old medium. The early content of television was radio. The early content of the internet was publications. I think what&#8217;s changing is that the phenomenon is not movement in a singular direction of &#8220;progress&#8221;. Perhaps we&#8217;re at the point where all media are fare game as content for all other media. </p>
<p>Sanford Dickert (@sanford) tweeted this from a Video 2.0 meetup:<br />
&#8220;Television is a technology, a lazy term &#8211; come up with a better one.&#8221; Ned from NYTVF<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/sanford/statuses/871063978" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/sanford/statuses/871063978</a></p>
<p>A short conversation ensued (I&#8217;m @mapkid):<br />
<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=television+mapkid" rel="nofollow">http://search.twitter.com/search?q=television+mapkid</a></p>
<p>Anyway, fascinating concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

